Disingenuous, Contemptible, or Both?

I’ve commented a couple of times before on the new licensing models that Microsoft has introduced with Office 2013.

The nub of the situation is that whilst with earlier versions of Office (e.g. Office 2003, Office 2007 and Office 2010) it was possible to transfer your licence from one computer to another; with Office 2013, if you buy a licence for Office 2013 and install it on a computer, that’s it. You can’t transfer it to another computer. So if, for example, after a couple of years, you upgrade your computer to a newer model, you can’t move your Office 2013 licence across. You have to purchase a completely new licence, which is in turn locked to your new computer.

I see that Jevon Fark, in Microsoft’s Office Team, has attempted to clarify the licensing situation. However, he singularly fails to make the proper comparison between the earlier so-called Full Package Product versions of Office 2003, 2007 and 2010 (i.e. Office products that were supplied with actual DVDs) and the current situation with Office 2013, where it is no longer possible to purchase the software. Instead, all you get is a product key, and if you download the software to a computer and activate it using the key – that’s it – it is locked to that particular computer.

So, is Fark’s blog post disingenuous, contemptible, or both?

In my opinion, it’s both.

I will neither purchase Office 2013 licences, nor subscribe (at five times the cost of my current Office licences). Instead I will continue to use my (transferable) Office 2010 licences for the foreseeable future. And if in the future I require to replace my Office 2010 product, then I will seriously consider alternatives before I look again at what Microsoft has to offer.

Update 6 March 2013: Well, it appears as though Microsoft has had second thoughts. Mr. Fark has now posted that it is possible to transfer licences between computers. Good to see that common sense can prevail after all. Thank you to all those who protested that Microsoft were doing the wrong thing with the original licence conditions.

About Geoff Coupe

I'm a British citizen, although I have lived and worked in the Netherlands since 1983. I came here on a three year assignment, but fell in love with the country, and one Dutchman in particular, and so have stayed here ever since. On the 13th December 2006 I also became a Dutch citizen.
This entry was posted in Computers and Internet. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Disingenuous, Contemptible, or Both?

  1. Simon Bradley says:

    This is something that bothers me, also, and I have pretty much the same plan as you, Geoff: I’ll continue with Office 2010 for now, but I’ll probably move to LibreOffice (assuming it maintains the same level of quality it enjoys now) when the time for an upgrade arrives.

  2. Mark says:

    I currently have no plans for office 2013 – the licensing thing is part of the issue ( I wonder how many people will be bitten by that a few years from now ) and I am more of a “buy” guy, not a “rent” guy so the whole monthly payment to keep using my software doesn’t appeal at all.

    But truth be told, I don’t use 99% of the power of office 2010, and the new features which are primarily cloud-centric don’t appeal to me, so the only reason I would have to upgrade would be ease-of-use and the the beta I played with was far too white and seemed worse in that regard.

    So I will be one of Therot’s “luddites” for as long as I can.

  3. Pingback: It’s an Incredible Deal – Part II | Geoff Coupe's Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.